Delano Marco Medina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \a state law interfering with a parent's right to have his child educated in a sectarian school would run afoul of the Free Exercise Clause\
• holding that “a state law interfering with a parent’s right to have his child educated in a sectarian school would run afoul of the Free Exercise Clause”
• recognizing that a state cannot prevent a parent from educating child in religious school
• holding that direct payments by a state to sectarian schools pursuant to a statute providing grants for maintenance and repair of school facilities as well as certain income tax deductions for tuition expenses at sectarian schools violate the Establishment Clause
• holding that direct payments by a state to sectarian schools pursuant to a statute providing grants for maintenance and repair of school facilities as well as certain income tax deductions for tuition expenses at sectarian schools violate the Establishment Clause
• holding statutes providing maintenance and repair benefits to private schools facially invalid because of inevitable effect of subsidizing religious mission of sectarian schools

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).