Delano Growers' Cooperative Winery v. Supreme Wine Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when parties “consistently follow[] the same procedure” for many years, there is a “clearly established . . . course of dealing between [the parties]”
• incidental damages allow re covery of buyer’s reasonable expenses incurred in handling rejected defective goods
• where parties used same procedure for processing wine for approximately five years, this established “a course of dealing” which defined the parties’ contractual obligations
• “One purpose of the notice requirement ... is to inform the seller of a breach and allow for settlement through negotiation.”
• notice is sufficient if it allows the seller to infer that the buyer is asserting its legal rights
• revocation of non-conforming wine allowed where wine was identified as seller’s wine, and there was no issue that the wine had been mixed with some other wine or substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).