Delancey v. City of Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no private right of action exists under 42 U.S.C. § 4625
• affirming summary judgment on URA claims for lack of private right of action
• “Applying the analysis announced by the Supreme Court in Gonzaga [Univ. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 286 (2002)] ..., we hold that the URA does not provide a private right of action for monetary damages”
• “[W]e hold that the URA does not provide a private right of action for monetary damages.”
• no private right of action for monetary damages under URA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).