Delacruz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he substantive component of the Due Process Clause . . . secures the right to be free of state- occasioned damage to a person’s bodily integrity” and noting that Dobbs did not impact this precedent (citation modified)
• acknowledging that Dobbs left undisturbed the right to bodily integrity
• noting both cases where uniformed officers were not held to act under color of law and those in which plainclothes officers were
• finding depute violated plaintiff’s right to bodily integrity by ordering her to strip and expose her genitals while he masturbated to her naked body
• rejecting qualified immunity; sheriff’s deputy used welfare check as pretense to force woman to “strip [to] her privates, to manually manipulate her genitals, and to remain exposed while he masturbated”
• rejecting qualified immunity; sheriff’s deputy used welfare check as pretense to force woman to “strip [to] her privates, to manually manipulate her genitals, and to remain exposed while he masturbated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).