District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/21/1992
Delacruz v. State
Citations
- 603 So. 2d 707
- 1992 WL 201976
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- there is no “controlled buy” when the informant is searched neither before nor after the purchase
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ryder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-01· cited 7×
- McCall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 5×
- Martin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-15· cited 5×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-22· cited 3×
- Raucho v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-07· cited 1×
- State v. StarksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-11· cited 1×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
- Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-08· cited 14×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-18· cited 10×
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-18· cited 8×
- Delgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-07· cited 8×
- Conatser v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.