Del Castillo v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s “modest allegations” of sexual advances from her supervisor could “hardly suffice to support a retaliation claim”
• holding' that simply declining a harasser’s sexual advances does not constitute “protected activity” in a Title VII retaliation claim
• plaintiff did not state retaliation claim where her immediate supervisor allegedly assigned her undesirable work after she rebuffed his sexual advances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).