Del Castillo Trelles, Daller v. Alternative Exterminating Comejen, Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner's seven-year long wait for his wife's NACARA claim to be adjudicated was reasonable under the circumstances and did not show lack of due diligence
• holding that petitioner’s seven-year long wait for his wife’s NACARA claim to be adjudicated was reasonable under the circumstances and did not show lack of due diligence
• explaining that in instances of fraudulent representation, “the limitations period is tolled until the petitioner definitively learns of counsel’s fraud” (quotation and citation omitted)
• applying Skidmore deference to the BIA’s interpretation “proportional to its thoroughness, reasoning, consistency, and ability to persuade”
• finding equitable tolling after a roughly seven-year delay when the petitioner had compelling grounds to trust his lawyer who was successful in obtaining relief for the petitioner’s wife
• BIA’s consideration of whether a fundamental change in the law warrants reopening involves an exercise of its sua sponte authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).