Dekalu Add Rufu v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for factual findings “to identify any items still in the possession of the Government and any items that might have been lost”
• remanding case where district court did not receive evidence showing what property was seized and how property was disposed of
• district court where defendant is tried has ancillary jurisdiction to decide defendant’s post-trial motion for return of seized proper ty
• district court where defendant is tried has ancillary jurisdiction to decide defendant’s post-trial motion for return of seized property
• “[T]he district court was required to take evidence and make factual findings to identify any items still in the possession of the Government and any items that might have been lost.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).