Dejun Kong v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that potential discovery of “helpful” and “new information . . . does not qualify as ‘good cause’ for modifying the scheduling order”
• finding that insurers who breached their duty to defend when they refused to provide the insured with any defense and were later sued by their insured could not seek equitable contribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).