Skip to main content
· 10/28/2005

DeJulius v. New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund

Citations

  • 429 F.3d 935
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23353
  • 2005 WL 2822473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the class members received adequate notice of a class settlement when the notices were “sent out nearly two weeks prior to the settlement hearing”
  • noting that district courts must consider undue prejudice or delay in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention
  • noting that district courts required to consider undue prejudice or delay in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention
  • noting that district courts are required to consider undue prejudice or delay in deciding whether to grant permissive intervention
  • noting that for due process purposes, a district court should give “the best notice practicable under the circumstances including individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort” (internal quotation omitted)
  • noting that due process inquiry “focuses upon whether the district court gave the best notice practicable under the circumstances including individual notice to all members who can be identified through reasonable effort” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Holloway, Lucero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.