DeJohn v. Temple University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 4(a)(2) did not permit challenge to the final judgment on an appeal from a prior interlocutory order
• holding that Rule 4(a)(2) did not permit challenge to the final judgment on an appeal from a prior interlocutory order
• noting that a judgment is not final until it reasonably resolves the extent of damages
• explaining that “a school must show that speech will cause actual, material disruption before prohibiting it”
• explaining that one element of a student’s Title IX hostile environment claim is severe and pervasive discrimination
• deciding graduate student's facial challenge to university's sexual harassment policy brought against university

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).