Deidre Davis v. Yolanda Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite lack of evidence of suffering by other inmates, plaintiff had presented enough evidence from which a reasonable jury could conclude that Cook County had a widespread custom or practice of failing to provide timely methadone treatment
• explaining that “when the evidence provides for only speculation or guessing, summary judgment is appropriate”
• explaining that “when the evidence provides for only speculation or guessing, summary judgment is appropriate”
• recognizing withdrawal symptoms caused by delays in prescribed methadone treatment is a “significant medical issue”
• noting that a single statement offering a general conclusion that was not specifically targeted to the plaintiff’s claims amounted “to little more than a bald and conclusory statement”
• noting that a single statement offering a general conclusion that was not specifically targeted to the plaintiff’s claims “amount[ed] to little more than a bald and conclusory statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).