Skip to main content
· 12/8/2010

Dei v. Tumara Food Mart, Inc.

Citations

  • 941 N.E.2d 920
  • 406 Ill. App. 3d 856
  • 347 Ill. Dec. 51
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that .service of process on an employee who was neither a registered agent nor an officer of the corporation was not proper service on the corporation
  • finding that an employee was not an agent of the defendant corporation, in part because “no one talked to him about what to do in the event that legal papers were served upon him”
  • it is an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny discovery concerning relevant evidence
  • where employee who received summons “left it on a table, unopened, as he did with all other papers and documents he received while at work,” this was “further evidence that he did not understand their import”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.