Skip to main content
· 9/16/1867

Dehoney v. Sandford

Citations

  • 65 Ky. 169
  • 2 Bush 169
  • 1867 Ky. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that various declarations and conventions do not confer jurisdiction on the Court of Federal Claims because they “are not acts of the United States Congress, signed by the President of the United States”
  • holding that various declarations and conventions do not confer jurisdiction on the Court of Federal Claims because they “are not acts of the United States Congress, signed by the President of the United States”
  • finding that the American Convention on Human Rights is not a money-mandating statute, regulation, or constitutional provision that allows for jurisdiction in this court
  • finding Congress has not conveyed jurisdiction to the Court of Federal Claims over alleged violations arising from UNDRIP

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.