Dehahn v. Innes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the salutary principle embodied in RCW 62A.2-201(3)(b) is applicable to a contract for the sale of goods alone but also should apply equally to the instant contract involving both goods and real estate
• noting that the various seller’s remedies set forth in the Uniform Commercial Code, including the recovery of the contract price, are cumulative
• noting that the judicial admission exception is intended “to limit the use of the statute of frauds as a shield against unfounded fraudulent claims resting in parol, while removing from the arsenal of an unscrupulous litigant an unrighteous defense against a just claim”
• “When the other party has already repudiated the agreement, a tender would be a futile act and is not required by law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).