DeGuzman v. Balsini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the notice of lis pendens failed to comply with section 48.23 because it did not state the time that an action was instituted, and it did not provide a statement of the relief sought as to the property
• “When the primary purpose of a lawsuit is to recover money damages and the action does not directly affect the title to or the right of possession of real property, the filing of a notice of lis pendens is not authorized.”
• “When the primary purpose of a lawsuit is to recover money damages and the action does not directly affect the title to or the right of possession of real property, the filing of a notice of lis pendens is not authorized.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).