DeGrandis v. Children's Hospital Boston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Mexia governs federal courts’ interpretation of the 18 Song-Beverly Act’s duration provision in the absence of convincing evidence that the California 19 Supreme Court would reach a different decision
• holding it was legal error when the ALJ “never connected the 15 medical record to Claimant’s testimony”
• noting that a summary of medical evidence “is not the 17 same as providing clear and convincing reasons”
• finding the agency 25 must set forth reasoning behind its decisions in a way that allows for meaningful 26 review
• remanding for an award of benefits is appropriate 21 in rare circumstances
• “[T]he credibility determination is exclusively the ALJ’s to make, and 18 ours only to review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).