DeGirolamo v. Applegate (In Re Applegate)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when applying §1334(c)(1) factors, courts employ “a muiti-factor balancing test, not a rule in which every element must be satisfied. . .”
• “The causes of action here make this a core proceeding, one ‘arising in’ a case under title 11 ... which makes the fact that [§ 1334(b) ] is the sole basis of jurisdiction less convincing as an argument for permissive abstention than it would be if § 1334(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).