DeFranze v. Valenzia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counsel’s reference to several verdict forms and the special interrogatory and suggestion of the proper answer the jury should reach on the special interrogatory did not constitute improper urging that the interrogatory answer should conform to the general verdict
• counsel's reference to several verdict forms and the special interrogatory and suggestion of the proper answer the jury should reach on the special interrogatory did not constitute improper urging that the interrogatory answer should conform to the general verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clarke v. MEDLEY MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-07· cited 29×
• Moore v. Checker Taxi Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-07-15· cited 28×
• Ramsey v. Greenwald
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-22· cited 15×
• Thomas v. Dalpos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-28· cited 9×
• Oothoudt v. Woodard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-05-05· cited 6×
• Clarke v. Medley Moving and Storage
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sommese v. Maling Bros., Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-11-14· cited 85×
• Wise v. Wise
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1959-07-16· cited 14×
• Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Gore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1903-04-24· cited 14×
• Gary v. Rogers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1968-12-30· cited 12×
• E. A. Meyer Constr. Co. v. Drobnick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-05-14· cited 12×