Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in interpreting 16 U.S.C. § 668dd(a)(4)(E), that the “Secretary [has] broad managerial discretion in how to pursue the Act’s objectives”
• noting that “the agencies are committed to ending supplemental feeding”
• noting that “the agencies are committed to ending supplemental feeding”
• plan made binding by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).