· 2/12/2001
Defenders of Wildlife v. Babbitt
Citations
- 130 F. Supp. 2d 121
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20477
- 52 ERC (BNA) 1301
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1480
- 2001 WL 135443
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an action area definition confined to the “immediate area involved” in the action was “explicitly reject[ed]” by the “expansive regulatory definition of action area”
- “There must be an analysis of the status of the environmental baseline given the listed impacts, not simply a recitation of the activities of the agencies.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huvelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.