Skip to main content
· 11/7/1986

Defend v. Lascelles

Citations

  • 500 N.E.2d 712
  • 149 Ill. App. 3d 630
  • 102 Ill. Dec. 819
  • 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 3091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an absolute privilege is “based upon the public interest of encouraging access to the court system while facilitating the truth-seeking process therein.”
  • stating that the \significant interest\ involved is the \facilitati[on] of the truth-seeking process\
  • stating that the “significant interest” involved is the “facilitati[on] of the truth-seeking process”
  • \The law thus clearly allows for an absolute privilege where there exists a significant interest in protecting the type of speech involved.\
  • “The law thus clearly allows for an absolute privilege where there exists a significant interest in protecting the type of speech involved.”
  • “The law thus clearly allows for an absolute privilege where there exists a significant interest in protecting the type of speech involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morthland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.