DeFEBO v. Andersen Windows, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “fraud-in-the-inducement claims are not always barred by the gist of the action doctrine”
• “[t]he doctrine specifically bars claims on extra-contractual statements regarding duties or obligations of a party that are later outlined in the contract.”
• “Despite these seemingly conflicting holdings, this Court is bound by a Third Circuit decision where that court has predicted how the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will decide an issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).