Skip to main content
· 11/30/1992

Deeter v. Dull Corp., Inc.

Citations

  • 617 A.2d 336
  • 420 Pa. Super. 576
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4012

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that by appealing the trial court’s order sustaining the defendant’s preliminary objections without prejudice, the plaintiffs appealed “a non[-]appealable interlocutory order”
  • “We have held that a contract of suretyship is solely between the principal debtor and the surety/obligor.”
  • notice of acceptance allows surety to know nature and extent of its liability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Montemuro, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.