Dees v. United States Commandant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a formulaic recitation of the elements of an abuse of process claim, without factual support of an ulterior purpose, failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted
• “Consequently, Rooker–Feldman does not bar an FDCPA claim challenging only a defendant’s debt-collection practices, without challenging the validity of the state-court judgment.”
• “Rooker-Feldman does not bar an 1 Heroux effectively defaulted in the state-court action by failing to appear after answering the complaint. 5 FDCPA claim challenging only a defendant’s debt-collection practices, without challenging the validity of the state-court judgment.”
• applying Rooker-Feldman to a state-court judgment allegedly procured through fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).