Deering v. Prosser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating rule in the context of possession of pseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine
• rejecting the State’s argument that a prima facie case of intent to manufacture was established by the defendant “attempting to shoplift more pseudoephedrine than he could legally purchase at one time”
• “[T]he independent evidence must support a logical and reasonable inference of criminal activity only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).