First Circuit· 6/22/2006
Deegan Patterson v. United States
Citations
- 451 F.3d 268
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15575
- 2006 WL 1703785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiffs residence in Georgia was “insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news” of the FBI’s involvement in decedent’s Boston-based murder
- concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
- concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
- “This limitations provision, ensuring that the government is promptly presented with a claim while the evidence is still fresh, is to be strictly construed in the government’s favor.”
- finding “widespread publicity” sufficient to overcome 35-year gap
- finding \widespread publicity\ sufficient to overcome 35-year gap
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lipez, Cyr, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grynberg v. Total S.A.Tenth Circuit· 2008-08-26· cited 209×
- Estate of Barrett Ex Rel. Estate of Barrett v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2006-09-07· cited 59×
- Roman-Cancel v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2010-07-22· cited 43×
- Donahue v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2011-02-10· cited 42×
- Donahue v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2011-10-06· cited 22×
- Davis v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2012-01-20· cited 14×
- Wojciechowicz v. United StatesD. Puerto Rico· 2008-09-18· cited 10×
- Volpe v. United StatesD. Massachusetts· 2008-04-14· cited 6×
- Sanchez Piñero v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentD. Puerto Rico· 2008-12-16· cited 3×
- Duke v. Cmty. Health Connections, Inc.District of Columbia· 2019-01-11· cited 3×
- Denton v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2011-09-12· cited 3×
- Kodar, LLC v. United StatesD. Rhode Island· 2012-06-06· cited 2×
- Donahue v. ConnollyD. Massachusetts· 2012-09-13· cited 2×
- Wojciechowicz v. United StatesD. Puerto Rico· 2007-02-20· cited 1×
- Gonzalez v. United StatesD. Puerto Rico· 2012-09-30· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court· 1979-11-28· cited 2,486×
- Skwira v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2003-09-15· cited 167×
- Miller v. RunyonSeventh Circuit· 1996-02-26· cited 160×
- Odessa Nunnally v. Charles MacCauslandFirst Circuit· 1993-06-10· cited 115×
- Lynette Santiago-Ramirez v. Secretary of the Department of DefenseFirst Circuit· 1993-01-27· cited 106×
- McIntyre v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2004-05-10· cited 84×
- Homero Lopez v. Citibank, N.A.First Circuit· 1987-01-12· cited 71×
- Stephen Barnhart v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1989-10-17· cited 56×
- Rakes v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2006-03-23· cited 55×
- Jesse J. Avila, Guardian Ad Litem of Daniel Cardona v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1984-04-19· cited 55×
- Marco v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-07-08· cited 34×
- Callahan v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 2005-10-18· cited 33×
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.First Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 15×
- Skwira, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Skwira v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 14×
- Daniel C. Free, as Administrator of the Estate of Lee Cratin Free v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1989-10-10· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.