Skip to main content
· 6/22/2006

Deegan Patterson v. United States

Citations

  • 451 F.3d 268
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15575
  • 2006 WL 1703785

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiffs residence in Georgia was “insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news” of the FBI’s involvement in decedent’s Boston-based murder
  • concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
  • concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
  • “This limitations provision, ensuring that the government is promptly presented with a claim while the evidence is still fresh, is to be strictly construed in the government’s favor.”
  • finding “widespread publicity” sufficient to overcome 35-year gap
  • finding \widespread publicity\ sufficient to overcome 35-year gap

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lipez, Cyr, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.