· 6/22/2006
Deegan Patterson v. United States
Citations
- 451 F.3d 268
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15575
- 2006 WL 1703785
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that plaintiffs residence in Georgia was “insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news” of the FBI’s involvement in decedent’s Boston-based murder
- concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
- concluding that plaintiff's residence in Georgia was \insufficient to vitiate a finding that she should have learned of the news\ of the FBI's involvement in decedent's Boston-based murder
- “This limitations provision, ensuring that the government is promptly presented with a claim while the evidence is still fresh, is to be strictly construed in the government’s favor.”
- finding “widespread publicity” sufficient to overcome 35-year gap
- finding \widespread publicity\ sufficient to overcome 35-year gap
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lipez, Cyr, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.