· 4/12/1905
Deeg v. Ettleson
Citations
- 38 Wash. 241
- 80 P. 437
- 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1155
Syllabus
<p>Appeal and Error—Review op Findings—Conflicting Evidence —Deed Intended as Mortgage. The finding of the trial court on conflicting evidence, that an absolute deed was intended as a mortgage, will not be disturbed on appeal where it is supported by direct and positive .evidence, and the supreme court is not convinced that the trial court erred.</p>
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.