Dee v. Dee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “nothing in the language or in the legislative history of [G. L. c. 208, § 34B] suggests that it was intended to permit anything other than an interim order of sixty 3 days’ total duration entered in advance of a hearing on the merits of a libel [complaint] for divorce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amonte v. Amonte
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-03-15· cited 13×
• Wyman v. Wyman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-06-19· cited 6×
• Randall v. Goldmark
  D. Massachusetts· 1973-11-13· cited 5×
• Pavlik v. Dmytryck
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1978-08-18· cited 5×
• Ricciardelli v. Ricciardelli
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1976-03-05· cited 3×
• DiMarzio v. DiMarzio
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1974-04-17· cited 2×
• Arnold v. Arnold
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-07-14· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Blessing
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-08-28· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Coe v. Coe
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-02-23· cited 75×
• Gediman v. Cameron
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-05-28· cited 33×
• MacLennan v. MacLennan
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-06-23· cited 33×
• Williamson v. Williamson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1923-09-14· cited 27×
• Dunnington v. Dunnington
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-09-22· cited 14×
• Verdone v. Verdone
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1963-06-21· cited 13×
• Gould v. Gould
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-03-09· cited 13×
• Collins v. Croteau
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1948-01-28· cited 10×
• White v. White
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1948-03-03· cited 8×