Dee v. Aukerman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 256 “seems to indicate a congressional interest in resolving inadvertent mistakes with respect to joint inventorship ... ”.
• “This court sees no persuasive reason that § 256 should not be read as conferring subject matter jurisdiction over this [patent correction] case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).