Skip to main content

DED v. State

Citations

  • 704 P.2d 774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the notice requirements of 25 USC 1912(a) do not apply to emergency custody proceedings held pursuant to 25 USC 1922
  • holding that the notice requirements of 25 USC 1912(a) do not apply to emergency custody proceedings held pursuant to 25 USC 1922

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, C.J., and Burke, Matthews, Compton and Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.