DeClemente v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the marks are used for different purposes and are presented to the public differently, even though they say the same thing, they are dissimilar and no issue of fact is created.”
• “The analysis to determine consumer confusion and misleading under the balancing test of Rogers is conducted by applying the eight[-]factor test for consumer confusion set forth in Polaroid [v. Polarad Elecs. Corp. 287 F.2d 492, 495 (2d Cir. 1961)].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).