Decker v. Tramiel (In Re JTS Corp.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bankruptcy court's finding as to 12 reasonably equivalent value was not \clearly erroneous\
• holding that bankruptcy court's finding as to 12 reasonably equivalent value was not \clearly erroneous\
• articulating that “[w]e must accept the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact, unless the court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”
• discussing the legislative history of the Bankruptcy Code, including 25 its amendments and how Congress did not intend to preempt state fraudulent transfer laws when passing and enacting the Bankruptcy 26 Code
• “Section 544 enables a bankruptcy trustee to avoid any transfer of property that an unsecured creditor with an allowable claim could have avoided under applicable state law.”
• “The Bankruptcy Court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, while its conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).