Skip to main content
· 3/20/2013

Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Citations

  • 133 S. Ct. 1326
  • 185 L. Ed. 2d 447
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 2373
  • 568 U.S. 597

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013 United States Supreme Court case

Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, 568 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a provision of the Clean Water Act governing challenges to Environmental Protection Agency actions, 33 U.S.C. § 1369(b), does not prohibit a citizen suit under Section 1365 when the suit is against an alleged violator and seeks to enforce an obligation imposed by the CWA or its regulations. The court also held that the case was not moot due to regulations issued in the interim. The case was consolidated with Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center.[1] [2]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decker_v._Northwest_Environmental_Defense_Center&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, 568 U.S. 597 (2013).
  2. Elwood, John (March 22, 2013). "Opinion analysis: Too soon to say "au revoir" to Auer?" . SCOTUSblog. Retrieved October 15, 2025.

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decker_v._Northwest_Environmental_Defense_Center&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: External links")
]

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court . As a work of the U.S. federal government , the text is in the **public domain **.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decker_v._Northwest_Environmental_Defense_Center&oldid=1351976705 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Add languages Add topic

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

Oral argument

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Scalia, Breyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.