Decker v. Fink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding impaired judgment as to medical malpractice action against psychiatrist was not sufficient to toll statute of limitations due to mental incompetency where plaintiff was able to make other decisions
• stating that the trial court is “the factfinder [sic] for purposes of determining the applicability of the statute of limitations” and its finding will not be set aside in the absence of clear error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).