Skip to main content
· 4/4/1989

Decenzo/Reisman/Kellog, M.D., P.A. v. Cespedes

Citations

  • 711 F. Supp. 612
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4162
  • 1989 WL 40116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The double bond requirement [for review of an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission] treats those financially unable to obtain the bond differently from those able to do so. Classifications based on wealth are valid if there is a rational basis to support them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spellman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.