Decatur Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Variety Vending Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claim was “pending” for purposes of Rule 13(a) exception when it was before the Maritime Board
• holding that counterclaim was the \subject of another pending action\ before the Maritime Board and therefore was not compulsory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).