DeCaro v. Hasbro, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that the written policies were not distributed to employees suggests that [employer] did not intend to bind itself to apply those policies consistently in all situations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Brettel v. Omron Scientific Techs., Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2018-03-27

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1999-05-24· cited 1,210×
• Myrtle Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Company
  First Circuit· 1999-07-15· cited 256×
• Andre Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1995-11-27· cited 201×
• Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-07-14· cited 185×
• Irving August v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1992-12-11· cited 180×
• Cordi-Allen v. Conlon
  First Circuit· 2007-07-27· cited 147×
• Russell v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-08-08· cited 138×
• Singarella v. City of Boston
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1961-04-04· cited 128×
• Albert A. Flibotte v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1997-12-10· cited 104×
• Orta-Castro v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Química P.R., Inc.
  First Circuit· 2006-05-09· cited 101×
• Salem Laundry Company v. New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund
  First Circuit· 1987-09-28· cited 31×
• Cargill v. Harvard University
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-03-08· cited 28×