Decarlo v. Fry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs can prove deliberate indifference by showing “that the municipality had notice of but repeatedly failed to make any meaningful investigation into charges that its agents were violating citizens’ constitutional rights” (citation omitted)
• “[A] single incident alleged in a complaint, especially if it involved only actors below the policy-making level, does not suffice to show a municipal policy.”
• “[A] single incident alleged in a complaint, especially if it involved only actors below the policy-making level, does not suffice to show a municipal policy.”
• “[A] single incident in a complaint, especially if it involved only actors below the policy-making level, does not suffice to show a municipal policy.”
• “a single incident alleged in a complaint, especially if it involved only actors below the policy-making level, does not suffice to show a municipal policy”
• “[A] single incident in a complaint, especially if it involved only actors below the policy-making level, does not suffice to show a municipal policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).