Debruce Grain, Inc., a Missouri Corporation v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Utah Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming on primary jurisdiction grounds district court’s conclusion that a refusal of service claim should be heard by the STB
• finding “[dismissal without prejudice was appropriate since it did not disadvantage DeBruce” and the STB’s decision could be appealed to this Court
• “The question of the reasonableness of a railroad’s response to a shortage of cars [was] ... one best left for agency resolution due to the need for specialized expertise and uniform national treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).