Debrow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing as plain error that the admission of evidence of defendant’s blood alcohol content was in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation
• sobre la admisión de resultados de pruebas de alcohol en la sangre cuando el técnico del laboratorio presentado no tenía conocimiento personal de las pruebas
• sobre la admisión de resultados de pruebas de alcohol en la sangre cuando el técnico del laboratorio presentado no tenía conocimiento personal de las pruebas
• “Debrow also argues that the admission of the results of his blood analysis violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation, as the State provided no foundation for the submission of this evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).