Debra J. Todd v. Merit Systems Protection Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the employee “has the burden of establishing that she and the action she seeks to appeal [are] within the [MSPB’s] jurisdiction”
• explaining that the employee “has the burden of establishing that she and the action she seeks to appeal [are] within the [B]oard’s jurisdiction”
• finding that an employee did not have Board appeal rights because she was appointed pursuant to a statute that specifically authorized agencies to employ individuals “without regard to . . . sections . . . 7511, 7512, and 7701 of Title 5”
• finding “no irreconcilability or repug-nancy between the general rule at section 7511(a)(1)(C) that excepted - service employees with two years of continuous service have appeal rights and the specific exception to this rule at section 241(a
• ex- plaining that the employee “has the burden of establishing that she and the action she seeks to appeal [are] within the [MSPB’s] jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).