DeBord v. Washington County School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff, who was seven years older than her replacement, could not satisfy this element because she offered no evidence of direct discrimination and 71% of defendant’s workforce was protected by the ADEA
• finding this element satisfied when the plaintiff presented evidence that she did not receive a negative job evaluation before she was terminated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).