Deborah Shafer v. Preston Memorial Hospital Corporation Victoria Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, upon conclusion that plaintiff’s proposed amendment was futile, district court correctly denied plaintiff’s motion to amend
• noting that \[w]e have consistently recognized that we may affirm a district court's decision on different grounds than those employed by the district court\
• rejecting plaintiffs argument that she could not be fired after being caught with drugs merely because she enrolled in rehabilitation program before termination took effect
• rejecting plaintiff’s argument that she could not be fired after being caught with drugs merely because she enrolled in rehabilitation program before termination took effect
• involving claims under the American with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Human Rights Act
• \We have consistently recognized that we may affirm a district court's decision on different grounds than those employed by the district court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).