DeBauge v. DeBauge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the erroneous admission of evidence was not outcome-determinative when the prosecution presented sufficient evidence from which the jury could convict the defendant
• stating that “a trial judge’s ruling regarding the admission of evidence, no matter how erroneous, is not grounds for disqualification”
• stating that “a trial judge’s ruling regarding the admission of evidence, no matter how erroneous, is not grounds for disqualification”
• explaining this Court reviews de novo the application of the facts to the relevant law regarding motions for disqualification
• “[T]he trial court provided a limiting instruction, which can help to alleviate any danger of unfair prejudice, given that jurors are presumed to follow their instructions.”
• “[A] prosecutor may not suggest that he or she has some special knowledge that [a] witness is testifying untruthfully.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).