Deavis Nathaniel Saulsberry v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court of appeals \must accord significant deference to the [district] court's informed determination that the section 3553(a) factors justify the sentence imposed\
• underscoring that appellants must present their arguments \face up and squarely in the court below\ to preserve them for appeal
• explaining that \a sentencing court is under no obligation . . . to address every argument that a defendant advances in support of his preferred sentence\
• discussing potential limitations of, and caution necessary when, applying private-search doctrine to cell phones and other digital devices
• “The Court did not define ‘virtual certainty,’ and it is not immediately apparent how that concept translates from the context of a static object like a package to the ever-changing screen on a cellphone.”
• “In general terms, [the private search] doctrine provides that law enforcement officers may, without a warrant, examine evidence that a private party has unearthed and made available to them, as long as their actions remain within the scope of the antecedent private search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).