Deauville Hotel Property, LLC v. Trane U.S. Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a petition dismissed by the state court on res judicata grounds was “properly filed”
• concluding that a petition dismissed by the state court on res judicata grounds was “properly filed”
• holding that an “expired limitations period cannot be revived by filing a state habeas petition”
• explaining that a second state petition, although ultimately dismissed as successive, may be properly filed for purposes of tolling the limitations period
• holding “that a ‘properly filed application’ for § 2244(d)(2) purposes is one that conforms with a state’s applicable procedural filing requirements”
• finding that Texas procedural rule forbidding courts from considering successive habeas applications allowed for exceptions and was not an a absolute bar to filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).