Deaton v. GAY TRUCKING COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying South Carolina law and citing Bennett v. Spartanburg Railway, Gas and Electric Company, 97 S.C. 27, 81 S.E. 189 (1914). But see Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 47 (1982) (suggesting contrary rule
• mere fact that all of decedents were related and represented by the same administratrix did not suffice to bar a subsequent action by another decedent for the same accident, because administratrix would be suing in a different capacity as to each accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).