· 8/4/1980
DeArmond v. Hoover Ball & Bearing
Citations
- 408 N.E.2d 771
- 86 Ill. App. 3d 1066
- 42 Ill. Dec. 193
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3351
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that issue is not whether guards are easily removable, but rather, whether they are easily removable by an operator
- affirming summary judgment for manufacturer when safety doors were removed by purchaser, regardless of how easy it was to remove the doors
- affirming summary judgment for manufacturer when safety doors were removed by purchaser, regardless of how easy it was to remove the doors
- summary judgment in favor of manufacturer of molding machine was proper where it was shown that interlock safety doors had been removed by em ployer
- summary judgment in favor of manufacturer of molding machine was proper where it was shown that interlock safety doors had been removed by employer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craven
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.