Skip to main content
· 8/4/1980

DeArmond v. Hoover Ball & Bearing

Citations

  • 408 N.E.2d 771
  • 86 Ill. App. 3d 1066
  • 42 Ill. Dec. 193
  • 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3351

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issue is not whether guards are easily removable, but rather, whether they are easily removable by an operator
  • affirming summary judgment for manufacturer when safety doors were removed by purchaser, regardless of how easy it was to remove the doors
  • affirming summary judgment for manufacturer when safety doors were removed by purchaser, regardless of how easy it was to remove the doors
  • summary judgment in favor of manufacturer of molding machine was proper where it was shown that interlock safety doors had been removed by em ployer
  • summary judgment in favor of manufacturer of molding machine was proper where it was shown that interlock safety doors had been removed by employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.