Dearmon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that bid protest costs were costs derived from Government’s implied contract duty to treat all bidders fairly
• stating that the bid protest process was designed, in part, to make “government procurement both more fair and more efficient”
• awarding disappointed bidders only bid preparation costs where the government breached its implied in fact contract to treat bids fairly
• awarding bid preparation costs to offerors when “misleading solicitation” resulted in a contract award using “rules [that] had been covertly changed”
• granting plaintiff summary judgment based in part on finding that its damages were foreseeable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).